Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2015 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (3) TMI 507 - HC - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
Condonation of delay in filing report by Official Liquidator; Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; Compliance with statutory requirements; Examination by Income Tax Authorities; Compliance with Form 2 and Form 66 under the Companies Act, 1956.

Condonation of Delay:
The Official Liquidator filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the report, which was not objected to by the Petitioner's Counsel. The delay was condoned, and the report was taken on record, leading to the disposal of the applications.

Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation:
The joint petition sought sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Various details regarding the Petitioner Companies, including their incorporation, capital structure, and compliance with necessary resolutions, were provided. The Court had earlier dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings, and after due process, the Scheme was presented for sanction. Reports from the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director were favorable, and no objections were received. The Court granted sanction to the Scheme, directing compliance with statutory requirements.

Examination by Income Tax Authorities:
The Regional Director raised concerns regarding the allotment of shares at a premium and compliance with Accounting Standard-14. The Petitioner Companies responded, stating their position on accounting standards and the liability for any tax payments. The Court allowed the Income Tax Authorities to assess the companies' income for a specified period and examine the share allotment issue, with the Transferee Company being liable for any tax liabilities.

Compliance with Form 2 and Form 66:
The Regional Director pointed out non-compliance with Form 2 and Form 66 under the Companies Act, 1956 by the companies. The Petitioner Companies responded, providing evidence of compliance with the required forms for the respective financial years. The concerns raised by the Regional Director were addressed, and the Court directed the companies to comply with the provisions of the Act.

This detailed analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, including the condonation of delay, sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation, examination by Income Tax Authorities, and compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates