Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (4) TMI 580 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
Cross-appeals by two different assessees and revenue against separate orders of CIT(A)-IV, Hyderabad for the assessment year 2009-2010 involving common issues of rejection of books of accounts and profit estimation.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Rejection of Books of Accounts
- The Assessing Officer rejected the books of accounts due to the assessee's failure to produce essential details like purchase and sales information, operating stock, production details, and machinery usage specifics.
- The rejection was based on discrepancies leading to the inability to ascertain the correct income, as the production and consumption details were not verifiable.
- The CIT(A) upheld the rejection emphasizing that being a listed company does not exempt the obligation to produce books for verification.
- The CIT(A) justified the rejection due to the assessee's failure to provide necessary documents for verification, despite regular audits.

Issue 2: Estimation of Profit
- The Assessing Officer estimated the income at 1.5% of the turnover due to the rejection of books of accounts.
- The CIT(A) directed the assessment at 1% of the turnover, deeming the initial estimation high.
- The assessee contested the estimation, citing an actual profit margin of 0.9% and requested a chance to explain entries and provide documents.
- The Tribunal allowed an opportunity for the assessee to produce books of accounts and documents for a denovo assessment, setting aside the CIT(A) order.
- The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cooperation and directed the assessee to provide all necessary information for a fair assessment.

Final Decision:
- The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes, granting an opportunity for denovo assessment by the Assessing Officer with cooperation from the assessee.
- The department's appeals were dismissed as infructuous due to the remittance of the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment.

This judgment highlights the significance of maintaining accurate books of accounts, the obligation to provide necessary documents for verification, and the procedural fairness in assessment proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates