9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (4) TMI 760 - AT - Income TaxAddition on account of accrued interest on loan classified as Non performing Assets - RBI prudential norms restricts accrual of interest on NPAs - Cooperative banks are covered under provisions of sec.43D - Held that - In the case of Karnataka High Court in Canfin Homes Ltd. 2011 (8) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT , it was held that the definition of non-performing asset shows an asset becomes non-performing when it ceases to yield income. Non-performing asset is an asset in respect of which interest has remained unpaid and has become past due. Once a particular asset is shown to be a non-performing asset, then the assumption is it is not yielding any revenue. When it is not yielding any revenue, the question of showing that revenue and paying tax would not arise. As is clear from the policy guidelines issued by the National Housing Bank, the income from non-performing asset should be recognised only when it is actually received. That is what, the Tribunal held in the instant case. Therefore, the contention of the revenue that in respect, of non-performing assets even though it does not yield any income as the assessee has adopted a mercantile system of accounting, he has to pay tax on the revenue which has accrued notionally is without any basis. In Karnavati Co-op. Bank Ltd. 2011 (11) TMI 367 - ITAT AHMEDABAD , the ITAT Ahmedabad Bench held that provisions of Sec.43D of the Act are applicable to Cooperative Banks also. In view of the same, respectfully following the decision of the Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court in Canfin Homes Ltd., the Revenue s appeal is dismissed. - Decided against the revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of accrued interest on loans classified as "Non-performing Assets" (NPAs). 2. Applicability of amended provisions of section 43D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to cooperative banks. Detailed Analysis: 1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Accrued Interest on NPAs: The Revenue appealed against the order of CIT (A) which deleted the addition of Rs. 10,49,668/- on account of accrued interest on loans classified as NPAs. The Assessing Officer (AO) had included this interest in the income of the assessee, a cooperative bank, on the basis that the bank followed the mercantile system of accounting and hence, the interest that had accrued on loans and advances had to be accounted for as income. The AO argued that RBI norms regarding NPAs were irrelevant for income computation under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Applicability of Amended Provisions of Section 43D: The AO also referenced section 43D, which was amended by the Finance Act of 1999, effective from 1.4.2000, providing that interest on NPAs need not be recognized as income for certain categories of assessees. The AO contended that these provisions did not apply to cooperative banks. Findings and Judgment: Recognition of Interest on NPAs: The CIT (A) had relied on the Supreme Court decision in UCO Bank v. CIT (1999) 237 ITR 889 and the Karnataka High Court decision in JCIT v. Canfin Homes Ltd (2011) 5 TaxCorp (DT) 49593, which held that interest on NPAs cannot be treated as income accrued to an assessee. The CIT (A) also cited the Ahmedabad ITAT decision in Karnavati Cooperative Bank v. DCIT (2012) 14 ITR (Trib) 175, which extended the provisions of section 43D to cooperative banks. Section 43D Analysis: Section 43D was introduced to address the Supreme Court's decision in State Bank of Travancore Vs. CIT 158 ITR 102 (SC), which mandated that interest on doubtful advances credited to "interest suspense account" should be considered as accrued income. Section 43D provides that for public financial institutions, scheduled banks, state financial corporations, and state industrial investment corporations, interest on bad or doubtful debts is chargeable to tax either in the year it is credited to the profit and loss account or when actually received, whichever is earlier. This provision was intended to override other provisions of the Act due to its non-obstante clause. Applicability to Cooperative Banks: The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench in Karnavati Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2012) held that section 43D applies to cooperative banks, emphasizing that the section overrides other provisions of the Act and must be applied in its letter and spirit. Additionally, the Bangalore Bench of ITAT in Shiva Sahakari Bank Niyamitha held that a cooperative bank need not recognize income on NPAs on an accrual basis, aligning with the jurisdictional High Court's decision in Canfin Homes Ltd. Conclusion: The Tribunal, after considering the rival submissions and the legal precedents, upheld the CIT (A)'s order, concluding that the deletion of the addition on account of accrued interest on NPAs was justified. The Tribunal found that the CIT (A)'s reliance on judicial precedents was appropriate and that the provisions of section 43D were applicable to cooperative banks. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. Order Pronouncement: The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 5th March 2015.
|
