9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Liability of the assessee to pay interest under section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Detailed Analysis: The case involved the assessment year 1972-73, where the petitioner was required to pay advance tax on specific dates. The petitioner contended that it made the necessary payments, including a significant sum on December 22, 1971, which the respondent claimed was paid on December 16, 1971. The assessment was completed on December 31, 1974, determining a final income-tax due. Subsequently, the petitioner was served with a notice for interest under section 215, which was imposed due to the alleged delay in payment of advance tax. The Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner upheld the levy of interest, albeit reducing the amount. The petitioner challenged these orders through a petition filed in 1981. The primary argument put forth by the petitioner was that any amount treated as advance tax during assessment should be considered as such for interest calculation under sections 215 and 214 of the Act. The petitioner relied on precedents like CIT v. Traub India Pvt Ltd. and Addl. CIT v. Chitra Sagar to support this contention. The petitioner emphasized that the payment made on December 22, 1971, was treated as advance tax during assessment, thereby negating the applicability of section 215 due to the absence of any shortfall in advance tax payment. Furthermore, the petitioner's counsel cited judgments from various High Courts, including Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, and Madras, which supported the view that the strict adherence to due dates for advance tax payments was not a prerequisite for interest calculation under section 215. These judgments emphasized that any payment made during the financial year, even if after the due date, should be considered as advance tax paid. The court also distinguished between penalties for late payments and interest under section 215, highlighting that interest aims to compensate for delayed payments and should not be imposed on amounts already paid. The court analyzed the provisions of section 215, emphasizing that interest is payable on the shortfall amount of advance tax paid, calculated from April 1 following the financial year until the regular assessment date. The court rejected the Revenue's argument that interest should be paid on delayed amounts even after payment, stating that interest ceases once the amount is paid. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the orders imposing interest under section 215, as there was no shortfall in advance tax payment when considering the amount treated as advance tax during assessment. In conclusion, the court set aside the orders dated January 20, 1979, and March 30, 1981, without any costs awarded.
|
