9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (9) TMI 868 - AT - CustomsImposition of godown charges - re-export of goods - Held that - The present appeal has been filed by the appellant where the case pertains to import of goods through baggage. As per preamble to the OIA dated 26.8.2013, passed by First Appellate Authority, appeal against such orders lies to the Under Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi as per Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act 1962. This Bench, therefore, has no jurisdiction to entertain the present appeal. The same is, therefore, disposed of as non-maintainable - Decided against assessee.
Issues:
Jurisdiction of the appellate tribunal in a baggage-related case. Analysis: The appeal in question was filed concerning a case involving the import of goods through baggage. The appellant, represented by Shri V V Gupta, claimed to be the legal heir of the deceased appellant who had arrived from Dubai with goods valued at Rs. 1,26,000. The appellant sought re-export of the goods, which was initially rejected by the Supdt. but later allowed by the First Appellate Authority. The appellant undertook re-export and paid godown charges, contending that no charges were due as the delay was on the customs authorities' part. During the proceedings, Shri L Patra, representing the Revenue, argued that since the case was baggage-related, the appeal should have been directed to the Under Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi, as per the preamble to the OIA dated 26.8.2014. Upon hearing both parties and examining the case records, it was established that the appeal fell under the jurisdiction of the Under Secretary as per Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act 1962. Consequently, the tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and deemed it non-maintainable. The appellant was advised to file the appeal before the appropriate authority as per the legal provisions. In summary, the appellate tribunal at CESTAT Ahmedabad, under the direction of Mr. H.K. Thakur, dismissed the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, emphasizing that appeals related to baggage cases should be directed to the designated authority as per the Customs Act 1962. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to the prescribed legal procedures and authorities in such matters, ensuring that appeals are filed with the appropriate bodies for adjudication.
|
