Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 819 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved:
Interpretation of the definition of 'interest' under the Interest Tax Act, 1974 in relation to income earned from investments in corporate bonds.

Analysis:
The High Court of Madras heard an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the taxability of interest earned on investments in corporate bonds. The appellant, engaged in providing long-term finance, invested surplus funds in corporate bonds and earned interest. The dispute arose when the Assessing Officer deemed this interest as exigible to interest tax under the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) initially allowed the appeal, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reversed this decision, leading to the current appeal.

To understand the dispute, the Court referred to the definition of 'interest' under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974, which includes interest on loans and advances made in India but excludes certain types of interest. The Court cited precedents to clarify the scope of 'interest,' emphasizing that interest on investments like debentures does not fall under the definition of 'interest on loans and advances.' Notably, the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Limited established that interest on bonds and debentures bought as investments is not taxable as interest under the Act.

The Court rejected the Department's argument that the Income Tax Act, 1961's exhaustive definition of 'interest' should apply, emphasizing that the case pertains to the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Court clarified that expressions defined in the Interest Tax Act should be interpreted within its provisions, with reference to the Income Tax Act only if necessary. Given the precedent set by the Supreme Court, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the interest earned on corporate bonds was not subject to interest tax under the Interest Tax Act, 1974.

In light of the above analysis, the Court allowed the tax case appeal in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the precedence set by the Supreme Court and the specific definitions within the Interest Tax Act, 1974 that govern the taxability of interest earned on investments in corporate bonds.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates