Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2015 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 1538 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Alleged misuse of Policy of Line of Control (LoC) trade
2. Import of Almonds under LoC trade policy

Analysis:
1. The petitioners, including Association of Agro Importers and Indo Foreign Chamber of Commerce, sought directions to implement the LoC trade policy and exclude Almond imports from it. They claimed that Californian Almonds were being illegally imported from Pakistan under the LoC trade policy, affecting local traders. The respondents, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Commerce, argued that Almonds grown in Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir were allowed for trade under the policy, with no third-country origin goods permitted. The Court noted the petitioners' failure to specify violations and held that judicial review cannot interfere with policy decisions made by the government.

2. The Court emphasized that the possibility of misuse does not invalidate a policy, and actual abuse must be proven for legal action. Citing precedents, the Court highlighted that administrative decisions should be presumed to be made in good faith unless proven otherwise. The Court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioners could file specific complaints of policy violations for appropriate action by the authorities. The judgment clarified that the dismissal did not prevent the petitioners from reporting violations for prompt redressal.

In conclusion, the High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition challenging the alleged misuse of the LoC trade policy regarding Almond imports. The judgment underscored the limitations of judicial review in policy matters, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence of abuse for legal intervention. The Court encouraged the petitioners to report specific violations for swift action by the concerned authorities, reiterating the principle that potential misuse does not automatically render a policy invalid.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates