1984 (10) TMI 11 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue notices u/s 148.
2. Validity of the reasons for the belief that income had escaped assessment.
3. Compliance with the statutory conditions precedent for reopening assessments u/s 147/148.
4. Adequacy of material before the Income-tax Officer to form a belief of income escaping assessment.
5. Judicial review of the reassessment proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Summary:

1. Jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue notices u/s 148:
The petitioner sought the quashing of proceedings initiated u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1963-64 to 1965-66 and 1967-68 to 1970-71. The Income-tax Officer issued notices proposing reassessment on the grounds that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Act.

2. Validity of the reasons for the belief that income had escaped assessment:
The reasons recorded for issuing the notices included the appearance of depositors' names in the list of bogus hundi brokers and bankers circulated by the Directorate of Investigation (D.I.). The reasons cited were identical or almost identical across different assessment years, indicating that the deposits were not genuine and represented the income of the assessee company from undisclosed sources.

3. Compliance with the statutory conditions precedent for reopening assessments u/s 147/148:
The statutory provisions u/s 147 require two conditions to be satisfied before the Income-tax Officer can form the belief that income has escaped assessment: (a) reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, and (b) such escapement is due to the omission or failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. Both conditions are conditions precedent for the jurisdiction to reopen an assessment.

4. Adequacy of material before the Income-tax Officer to form a belief of income escaping assessment:
The material before the Income-tax Officer included circulars issued by the D.I. and admissions by certain persons other than the assessee. However, there was no direct nexus or live link between the material and the belief that the deposits were not genuine. The original assessment records showed that the credits were investigated in detail, and the loans were held to be proved. The belief of the Income-tax Officer was based on no material, as there was no indication that the name-lending was in connection with the loans involved in the assessments under consideration.

5. Judicial review of the reassessment proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India:
The High Court has the power to set aside a notice issued u/s 147 if the condition precedent to the exercise of jurisdiction does not exist. The court determined that the Income-tax Officer did not have any material to form a reasonable belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. Therefore, the condition precedent for the exercise of jurisdiction by the Income-tax Officer was lacking.

Conclusion:
The writ petitions were allowed, and the impugned notices were quashed. The court found that the condition precedent for the exercise of jurisdiction by the Income-tax Officer did not exist, as there was no material to form a belief that income had escaped assessment. No order as to costs was made.