9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 212 - AT - Income TaxExemption u/s. 11 denied - whether mere grant of registration u/s. 12A does not entitle the Assessee for exemption u/s. 11 and that the real activity of the society has to be looked into? - whether these activities of the Society would fall within the term of Education for the purpose of Section 2(15)? - Held that - The activities carried out by the assessee fall within the term Education . The Revenue was wrong coming to the conclusion that, only when Assessee runs schools directly, it can be held to impart education. In my view, the Education can be imparted, even through affiliated schools also. A perusal of the activities listed above demonstrates the same. The acitivty of the assessee-society in my view is educational acitvity. The exemption cannot be denied to the Assessee u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961. The assessee is not engaged in any commercial acitvity. It does not carry on any business, trade or commerce. The fee charged cannot be called a business receipt or fee taken for business activity or for service in relation to any trade, commerce or business. There is no profit motive in the case of the assesseen, hence, the Proviso in question is not attracted in the case of the assessee. Hence, direct the Assessing Officer to grant exemption u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities of the Society fall within the term "Education" under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the Society's activities can be considered as business activities, thereby disqualifying it from exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Whether the Society is eligible for exemption under the principle of mutuality or Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. Whether the Society's registration under Section 12A entitles it to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Whether the activities of the Society fall within the term "Education" under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The Society argued that its activities should be classified as "Education" under Section 2(15). The Society affiliates 65 schools and engages in various educational activities including conducting conferences, exams, appointing principals, setting pay scales, publishing magazines, organizing sports and science fairs, providing scholarships, and offering financial assistance. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's interpretation of "Education" in Lok Shikshana Trust vs. CIT, which defines education as the systematic instruction, schooling, or training of students. The Tribunal concluded that the Society's activities fall within this definition, emphasizing that education can be imparted through affiliated schools. Therefore, the Society's activities are deemed educational. 2. Whether the Society's activities can be considered as business activities, thereby disqualifying it from exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the Society's activities were in the nature of business, thus attracting the proviso to Section 2(15) and disqualifying it from exemption under Section 11. However, the Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in M/s GSI India vs. DIT, which states that activities involving trade, commerce, or business should be undertaken with a profit motive to be classified as such. The Tribunal found no profit motive in the Society's activities and ruled that the fees charged were not business receipts. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to grant exemption under Section 11, as the proviso to Section 2(15) was not applicable. 3. Whether the Society is eligible for exemption under the principle of mutuality or Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The Society's alternative claims for exemption under the principle of mutuality and Section 10(23C) were rejected by the CIT(A) on the grounds that these claims were not made in the return of income and that the receipts from affiliated schools were in the nature of fees, not mutual contributions. The Tribunal did not address these arguments, as relief was already granted under Section 11. 4. Whether the Society's registration under Section 12A entitles it to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: The AO argued that mere registration under Section 12A does not automatically entitle the Society to exemption under Section 11, and the real activities of the Society must be examined. The Tribunal, however, found that the Society's activities were indeed educational and not commercial. As such, the Society's registration under Section 12A, combined with its educational activities, entitles it to exemption under Section 11. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Society, directing the AO to grant exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Society's activities were deemed educational and not commercial, and the proviso to Section 2(15) was found inapplicable. The Tribunal did not address the alternative claims under the principle of mutuality and Section 10(23C), as the primary relief was already granted.
|
