9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 357 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance deduction u/s.80IB(10) - Held that - No merit for declining of claim of deduction on the plea of completion certificate having been not obtained within a period of four years, in respect of projects which was approved prior to 1st April, 2005. Accordingly, the AO is directed to allow assessee s claim for deduction u/s.80IB(10) for both the years under consideration. See case of Happy Homes Enterprises 2014 (9) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - Decided in favour of assessee
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act due to non-obtainment of the completion certificate within the stipulated period. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80IB(10) - Background: The assessee, a partnership firm in the business of builders and developers, claimed a deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for its "Vrindavan Complex" project. The Assessing Officer (AO) initially accepted this claim but later reopened the assessment upon receiving information that the local authorities had not issued the occupation certificate before the stipulated date of 31-3-2008. - Reassessment Proceedings: During reassessment, the AO noted that the project commenced on 28-10-2002, and thus, the occupation certificate should have been obtained by 31-3-2008. The assessee argued that it had applied for the occupation certificate on time, but the local authorities did not communicate any reasons for not issuing it. The AO, however, declined the deduction claim due to the absence of the completion certificate. - CIT(A) Order: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] upheld the AO's decision, leading to the assessee's appeal before the ITAT. - Assessee's Argument: The assessee contended that since the project was approved before 1st April 2005, the condition for obtaining a completion certificate, introduced by the Finance Act 2004 effective from 1-4-2005, should not apply. The assessee provided various documents to substantiate that the project was completed within the stipulated period, including water connection orders, society registration receipts, and application for the occupation certificate. - ITAT Findings: The ITAT examined the relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents. It noted that the provisions of Section 80IB(10) before the amendment did not require a completion certificate. The amendment by the Finance Act 2004, effective from 1-4-2005, introduced the requirement for a completion certificate, but this was not applicable to projects approved before this date. - Legal Precedents: The ITAT referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Happy Homes Enterprises, which held that the amended provisions were prospective and not applicable to projects approved before 1-4-2005. The ITAT also cited the Indore Bench of ITAT in Raj Reality, which supported the view that the completion certificate requirement did not apply to projects approved before the amendment date. - Conclusion: The ITAT concluded that for projects approved before 1-4-2005, the condition of obtaining a completion certificate within four years did not apply. Therefore, the AO was directed to allow the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IB(10) for both assessment years. - Outcome: The appeals of the assessee were allowed in part, and the AO was instructed to grant the deduction under Section 80IB(10). Final Judgment: The appeals were decided in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to allow the deduction claims under Section 80IB(10) for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The ITAT's decision was based on the interpretation that the requirement for a completion certificate, introduced by the Finance Act 2004, did not apply retrospectively to projects approved before 1-4-2005.
|
