2010 (3) TMI 1238 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the question of whether interest income from fixed deposits made in banks can be treated as business income for an assessee engaged in export business, and whether such interest income can be considered for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act.

Facts and Decision:
The respondent-assessee, engaged in the export business of silk waste and polished granites, received interest income from fixed deposits made in banks. The Assessing Officer treated this income as from other sources, not business income, and disallowed deduction under sec. 80HHC. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this decision, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the deduction, citing a Calcutta High Court decision. The High Court found that the fixed deposits were pledged as security for business loans, and the interest earned should be considered business income, not income from other sources. Relying on previous court decisions, the High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal.

Arguments and Analysis:
The revenue contended that the interest income should not be treated as business income since the assessee's primary business was export, not banking. They cited a Supreme Court decision in support. The respondent argued that the interest income was directly related to business activities, as the fixed deposits were used as collateral for business loans. They referenced court decisions to support their stance. The High Court noted that the fixed deposits were essential for obtaining credit facilities for the export business, and the interest paid on these deposits should be considered a business expenditure. As the assessee had no other business, the interest income was rightly treated as business income for the purpose of deduction under section 80HHC.

Precedents and Conclusion:
The High Court referred to previous decisions where interest income on fixed deposits related to business activities was considered business income. They distinguished a Supreme Court decision cited by the revenue, stating it was not applicable to the present case. Ultimately, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, granting the deduction under section 80HHC and dismissing the revenue's appeal.