9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of revocable settlement deed for income tax assessment. Analysis: The judgment pertains to a case where the Tribunal referred a question regarding the revocability of a settlement made by an individual in favor of family members for income tax assessment. The settlement deed involved transferring shares in a business to family members, with conditions related to management and revocability. The Tribunal held the settlement deed revocable based on provisions of the 1922 Act, which was deemed incorrect by the High Court. The High Court emphasized that the assessment should be based on the provisions of the 1961 Act, which was in force during the relevant years. The court highlighted sections 60, 61, 62, and 63 of the 1961 Act, which define revocable transfers and their tax implications. The court analyzed the settlement deed's clauses, particularly focusing on a provision for the retransfer of income or assets to the transferor, which rendered the transfer revocable under section 63(a)(i) of the Act. Referring to previous court decisions, the High Court emphasized that if a transfer contains any provision for the retransfer of income or assets to the transferor, it shall be deemed revocable. The court also cited a case from the Madras High Court, further supporting the interpretation of revocable transfers under the Act. The court rejected the argument that revocability only applied to a specific share of the transfer, asserting that the settlement deed constituted a single, indivisible transfer. Additionally, the court dismissed the contention that revocability ceased to apply after the formation of a partnership, emphasizing that the settlement deed's terms continued to govern the assessment of income. The court concluded that the settlement deed was revocable under the Act's provisions, leading to the inclusion of the business income in the transferor's total income for tax assessment purposes. In conclusion, the High Court determined that the settlement deed was revocable under sections 60 to 63 of the Act, resulting in the inclusion of the business income in the transferor's total income. The court ruled in favor of assessing the income based on the settlement deed's revocable nature, rejecting arguments to the contrary. No costs were awarded in the case.
|
