2017 (1) TMI 1651 - AT - Income Tax

Classification of income - Interest received on FDRs in the year under consideration prior to the commencement of its business - Income from other sources or business income - HELD THAT - The issue relating to the treatment to be given to the interest income earned by the assessee on FDRs kept with Bank before the commencement of business is squarely covered against the assessee by the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited (1997 (7) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT) and respectfully following the same, we uphold the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in bringing to tax interest income in question in the hands of the assessee under the head income from other sources . - Decided against assessee.

Summary

Issues:
Treatment of interest income on FDRs received before commencement of business.

Analysis:
The appeal concerned the treatment of interest income of ?5,30,247 received by the assessee on Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) before commencing business activities. The company had initiated planning for a Thermal Power Project but had not commenced business operations. The Assessing Officer brought the interest income to tax under the head "income from other sources," rejecting the assessee's adjustment against preoperative/project expenses. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this decision, citing the Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals case as more relevant than the Bokaro Steel case. The Tribunal noted that the interest income was earned during the pre-operative period and analyzed the applicability of the Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals case, emphasizing that interest income is of revenue nature unless received as damages or compensation.

The Tribunal differentiated the Bokaro Steel case, where income was received for various activities before business commencement, from the current scenario involving interest earned on surplus funds kept in FDRs. The Bokaro Steel case involved income from quarters provided to contractors, advances made to contractors, plant and machinery hire charges, royalty income, and interest income from locomotives. The Tribunal concluded that the Bokaro Steel case did not align with the interest income scenario in the present case. The decision in the Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals case was deemed applicable, emphasizing that interest income is taxable when earned, irrespective of its utilization, and must be assessed based on legal principles rather than accounting practices.

Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision to tax the interest income under the head "income from other sources," based on the Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals case. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on January 6, 2017.