Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases SEBI SEBI + AT SEBI - 2019 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (2) TMI 1685 - AT - SEBI


Issues:
1. Delay in filing the appeal.
2. Removal of a company from the Dissemination Board by the National Stock Exchange.
3. Legality of the buy-back offer made by the company.
4. Interpretation of SEBI circulars regarding buy-back offers.
5. Applicability of SEBI circular dated July 25, 2017.
6. Justification of the order removing the company from the Dissemination Board.

Delay in filing the appeal:
The appellant filed an appeal against the order passed by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) allowing the removal of a company from the Dissemination Board. A delay of 5 days in filing the appeal was condoned based on the cause shown, and the application was allowed.

Removal of a company from the Dissemination Board:
The appellant, a shareholder of the company in question, contested the order removing the company from the Dissemination Board. The company's shares were placed on the Dissemination Board of NSE after the Madras Stock Exchange surrendered its recognition. The appellant argued that the buy-back offer made by the company was illegal, as SEBI circulars only permitted promoters, not the company, to buy back shares. However, SEBI circular dated July 25, 2017, allowed the company to buy back shares to provide an exit to public shareholders. The tribunal found no illegality in the removal of the company from the Dissemination Board.

Legality of the buy-back offer made by the company:
The appellant contended that the buy-back offer made by the company was illegal as per SEBI circulars. The tribunal noted that the circular dated July 25, 2017, permitted the company to buy back shares to facilitate an exit for public shareholders. Therefore, the tribunal found no illegality in the buy-back process.

Interpretation of SEBI circulars regarding buy-back offers:
The appellant argued that SEBI circulars only allowed promoters, not the company, to buy back shares. However, the tribunal highlighted that the circular dated July 25, 2017, authorized the company to conduct a buy-back to provide an exit opportunity to public shareholders, thus justifying the legality of the buy-back offer.

Applicability of SEBI circular dated July 25, 2017:
The tribunal emphasized the significance of the SEBI circular issued on July 25, 2017, which permitted the company to buy back shares to facilitate an exit for public shareholders. This circular played a crucial role in validating the legality of the buy-back offer made by the company.

Justification of the order removing the company from the Dissemination Board:
After considering the arguments presented, the tribunal concluded that there was no illegality in the order dated July 2, 2018, removing the company from the Dissemination Board. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded in the circumstances of the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates