Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (5) TMI 1929 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Appeal against disallowance of expenses under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 related to honorarium to doctors, travel and stay facilities, distribution of books, exhibition/sponsorship expenses, and other promotional expenses. Interpretation of Indian Medical Council Regulations and CBDT Circular No. 05/2012. Applicability and prospective nature of CBDT Circular for the assessment year 2011-12.

Analysis:
The appeal involved challenging the disallowance of expenses under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 related to various activities benefiting doctors, including honorarium, travel, distribution of books, exhibition/sponsorship, and promotional expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) based the disallowance on the Indian Medical Council Regulations, specifically clause 6.8 inserted in 2009, prohibiting doctors from receiving freebies. The AO also referred to CBDT Circular No. 05/2012, highlighting the inadmissibility of expenses providing freebies to medical practitioners. The total disallowed amount was ?1,33,92,060.

The appellant contended that the expenses were incurred for business purposes and not as freebies to doctors. The appellant argued that the CBDT Circular did not apply to these expenses. However, the AO upheld the disallowance. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed a partial addition, leading to an appeal before the ITAT Mumbai.

During the hearing, the appellant cited precedents to support the prospective nature of CBDT Circular No. 05/2012, emphasizing its inapplicability to the assessment year 2011-12. The appellant's counsel relied on various tribunal decisions to strengthen this argument.

On the contrary, the Departmental Representative (DR) argued that the amended Indian Medical Council Regulations, effective from 2009, were applicable to the assessment year in question. The DR supported the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the disallowance.

The ITAT Mumbai analyzed the submissions and evidence on record. The tribunal noted that the AO failed to verify the business purpose of the expenses and instead relied on general propositions, not specific facts. The tribunal emphasized that compliance was met, and the amended IMC Regulations were not applicable in this case. Additionally, the tribunal reiterated that CBDT Circulars are prospective and held in line with previous decisions.

Ultimately, the ITAT Mumbai set aside the CIT(A)'s order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the non-applicability of the CBDT Circular to the assessment year 2011-12. The judgment was pronounced on 30/05/2018.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates