2018 (2) TMI 1944 - HC - Income Tax

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity to Reasons to believe - HELD THAT - Reassessment in this case was validly based on fresh material in the form of information received by the concerned authorities during the course of search assessment and disclosures made. They would fit the description of tangible material unavailable with the Revenue at the time the original assessment was completed. Furthermore, in the present case, the original assessment was not completed under Section 143(3) of the Act, rather, merely framed under Section 142(1) of the Act. Having regard to these facts, the impugned order is clearly untenable and set aside. ITAT is directed to examine the merits of the respondent/assessee s appeal and decide it in accordance with law after hearing counsel for the parties. - Decided in favour of the Revenue

Summary

Issues:
1. Validity of re-assessment notice and proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The High Court considered the issue of whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in holding the re-assessment notice and further proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as invalid. The respondent's assessment for the A.Y. 2006-07 was initially completed under Section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, based on new information, a re-assessment notice was issued under Section 147 of the Act in 2013. The reasons for re-assessment were related to fresh information regarding accommodation entries received by certain entities during a search and seizure operation. The ITAT set aside the re-assessment on the grounds of invalidity, which was challenged before the High Court.

The Court examined the "Reasons to believe" recorded by the ITAT, which included details obtained during search cases of specific individuals providing accommodation entries. The Court found that the re-assessment was validly based on fresh material received during the search assessment, constituting "tangible material" not available during the original assessment. It was noted that the original assessment was not completed under Section 143(3) of the Act but under Section 142(1). Considering these factors, the Court deemed the ITAT's decision as untenable and set it aside.

The High Court directed the ITAT to reconsider the merits of the respondent's appeal after hearing both parties. The decision was made in favor of the Revenue and against the respondent-assessee. The parties were instructed to appear before the ITAT for further directions. The Registry was directed to communicate the order to the ITAT, and the order was to be provided to the parties directly.