9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Whether litigation expenses incurred by the appellant-company for the protection of its cash resources are allowable under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act. Analysis: The case involved the appellant-company negotiating with a UK company for the supply of moulds. The UK company sued the appellant for breach of contract, resulting in a decree for damages and costs. A compromise was reached where the appellant accepted moulds worth lb6,000. The appellant claimed litigation expenses of Rs. 29,997 as a revenue expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Income Tax Tribunal disallowed the claim, leading to the reference question. The court noted that the transaction involved acquiring moulds as capital assets, with litigation occurring during the acquisition process. The expenses were incurred before the acquisition of the capital assets and were not for protecting already acquired assets. Previous cases cited by the appellant's counsel dealt with expenses for protecting existing capital assets, unlike the current situation where litigation arose during the acquisition process. Therefore, the court held that the litigation expenses were of a capital nature and not allowable under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act. The court answered the reference question in the negative, ruling against the appellant. The appellant was directed to pay costs to the department, with counsel's fee assessed at Rs. 200. The judgment emphasized the distinction between expenses incurred for protecting existing capital assets and those incurred during the process of acquiring capital assets, determining the nature of the expenses based on the timing and purpose of their incurrence.
|
