1962 (8) TMI 123 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of capital gains on the sale of rights to subscribe to new shares.
2. Calculation of the actual cost of acquiring rights for capital gains computation.
3. Applicability of accounting principles in the valuation of stock rights for tax purposes.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of Capital Gains on the Sale of Rights to Subscribe to New Shares:
The assessee, who inherited 710 shares of Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited, sold her rights to subscribe to new shares for Rs. 45,262.50. The Income Tax authorities classified this entire amount as capital gain under section 12B of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that the value of the rights should be deducted from the sale proceeds to determine the actual capital gain. The Tribunal, however, did not accept this contention and referred the question to the High Court for determination.

2. Calculation of the Actual Cost of Acquiring Rights for Capital Gains Computation:
The assessee argued that the cost of the rights should be considered in the computation of capital gains. She suggested that the market value of the shares as of January 1, 1954, which was Rs. 341 per share, included the cost of the rights. The assessee referred to principles of accountancy to claim that the value of the rights was approximately Rs. 73 to Rs. 77 per share, which should be deducted to calculate the capital gain. However, the High Court held that the "actual cost to the assessee" under section 12B(2)(ii) of the Act refers to the amount actually expended or laid out for acquiring the capital asset. Since the assessee did not incur any expenditure to acquire the rights, the entire sale proceeds of Rs. 45,262.50 were deemed as capital gains.

3. Applicability of Accounting Principles in the Valuation of Stock Rights for Tax Purposes:
The assessee relied on accounting principles from various authoritative books to argue for the valuation of the rights. The High Court acknowledged that while accounting principles can attribute value to stock rights, these principles do not apply to tax matters. The Court emphasized that tax rules differ from accounting procedures, and the actual cost must be determined based on what was expended or laid out. The theoretical allocation of cost between stock rights and stock investments, as suggested by accounting principles, was not applicable for determining capital gains under the Income Tax Act.

Conclusion:
The High Court concluded that the entire amount of Rs. 45,262.50 received by the assessee from the sale of rights was a capital gain. The Court rejected the assessee's claim for deduction based on the theoretical value of the rights and held that the actual cost to the assessee for acquiring the rights was nil. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the question referred was answered in the negative. The assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the Commissioner.