9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether technical aid fees paid to a foreign collaborator should be treated as revenue or capital expenditure. 2. Whether receipts from service charges and sale of scraps can be included in income for tax relief under section 80-I. Issue 1: The court referred to a previous decision in CIT v. Wheels India Ltd. and CIT v. Sundaram Clayton Ltd. to answer the question regarding the treatment of technical aid fees paid to a foreign collaborator. The court held that the entire technical aid fees should be allowed as a revenue expenditure, following the precedent set by the mentioned cases. Issue 2: Regarding the entitlement to relief under section 80-I for receipts from service charges and sale of scraps, the court considered whether these receipts can be included in the income eligible for tax relief. The Department argued that relief under section 80-I is restricted to profits and gains attributable to a priority industry, and thus, receipts from service charges and sale of scraps should not be included. However, the Tribunal found that these receipts were related to the priority industry and should be attributed to it. The court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT, where it was held that amounts included in total income, such as balancing charges, can be considered as profits and gains attributable to a priority industry. The court applied this interpretation to the present case and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the inclusion of receipts from service charges and sale of scraps in the income eligible for relief under section 80-I. In conclusion, the court answered both questions of law in favor of the assessee and against the Department, based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.
|
