Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + SC Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2017 (9) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (9) TMI 1900 - SC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Application for vacating/modification of the order dated 04.09.2017.
2. Concerns regarding stay affecting management of respondent No.3.
3. Protection of rights of creditors and consumers.
4. Formulation of a preliminary scheme by the Interim Resolution Professional.
5. Interest of home buyers and their representation in the proceedings.
6. Directions regarding the Management of Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (JIL).
7. Participation of counsel in the Committee of Creditors.
8. Restrictions on Managing Director and Directors of JIL and JAL.
9. Deposit of sum by JAL before the Court.
10. Stay on suits and proceedings against JIL.
11. Clarification on the order passed.

Analysis:
1. The judgment addresses an application for vacating/modifying the order dated 04.09.2017. The Attorney General expressed concerns that the stay might restore the management of respondent No.3, impacting creditors and consumers. The Court acknowledged the need to protect stakeholders' interests.

2. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was directed to take over the Management of Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (JIL) and formulate an Interim Resolution Plan within 45 days to safeguard the home buyers' interests, addressing concerns raised by various parties.

3. Counsel representing home buyers emphasized their investment with JIL and sought protection for their interests. The Court directed the IRP to ensure provisions in the Interim Resolution Plan for the home buyers' benefit and appointed counsel to participate in the Committee of Creditors.

4. Restrictions were imposed on the Managing Director and Directors of JIL and its holding company, Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. (JAL), preventing them from leaving India without Court permission. JAL was instructed to deposit a specified sum before the Court.

5. The Court stayed suits and proceedings against JIL, emphasizing the importance of the order in line with the statutory provisions and the interest of home buyers. The judgment aimed to balance the rights of stakeholders while ensuring the effective resolution of the matter.

6. Overall, the judgment focused on addressing the complex issues surrounding the management and resolution of Jaypee Infratech Ltd., prioritizing the protection of creditors, consumers, and particularly the interests of home buyers. The directions provided aimed at ensuring a fair and transparent resolution process in compliance with the relevant legal framework.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates