Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (3) TMI 1825 - AT - Income TaxMonetary limit to file appeal - low tax effect - Revenue has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition on the ground that the Circular No.21/2015 of CBDT is not applicable to the appeal of the Revenue - Reopening of assessment on audit objection disallowing expenditure paid to Cochin Port Trust, for non-deduction of tax - HELD THAT - AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 on the basis of audit objection and disallowed an expenditure being the sum paid to Cochin Port Trust towards port charges. Admittedly, the appeal was not filed on the basis of audit objection. The assessment was reopened on the basis of audit objection. On perusal of the approval granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Rule 15 of Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, it appears that the appeal was filed in the regular course and not on the basis of audit objection. Therefore, it is obvious that para 8 of Circular No.21 of 2015 issued by CBDT is not applicable. Hence, the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the Revenue has no merit at all.
Issues involved:
1. Applicability of Circular No.21/2015 of CBDT to the appeal of the Revenue 2. Dismissal of appeal by Tribunal due to tax effect being less than ?10 lakhs 3. Reopening of assessment based on audit objection and disallowance of expenditure Analysis: Issue 1: Applicability of Circular No.21/2015 The Revenue filed a Miscellaneous Petition contending that Circular No.21/2015 of CBDT is not applicable to their appeal. The Ld. Departmental Representative argued that the Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the tax effect being less than ?10 lakhs. However, it was highlighted that the assessment was reopened based on an audit objection regarding the disallowance of an expenditure of ?8,96,000 paid to Cochin Port Trust for non-deduction of tax. The Ld. D.R. asserted that due to this audit objection, Circular No.21/2015 should not be applicable to the present appeal. Issue 2: Dismissal of appeal by Tribunal Despite the tax effect involved in the appeal being ?6,13,140, it was noted that the assessment was reopened under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on an audit objection. The appeal was not filed on the basis of this audit objection, as confirmed by the approval granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The appeal was filed in the regular course and not due to the audit objection. Therefore, it was concluded that the Circular No.21/2015 issued by CBDT was not applicable to the situation, rendering the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the Revenue meritless. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the Revenue. Issue 3: Reopening of assessment and disallowance of expenditure The assessment was reopened under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on an audit objection, leading to the disallowance of an expenditure of ?8,96,000 paid to Cochin Port Trust for port charges. The appeal was not initiated due to this audit objection but was filed in the regular course. The approval granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax confirmed that the appeal was not based on the audit objection. Therefore, it was established that the Circular No.21/2015 issued by CBDT was not applicable to the appeal, and the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the Revenue was dismissed accordingly. This comprehensive analysis of the judgment delves into the issues surrounding the applicability of Circular No.21/2015 of CBDT, the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal, and the reopening of the assessment based on an audit objection and subsequent disallowance of expenditure.
|