2007 (8) TMI 198 - AT - Service Tax

Business Support Service Appellant appointed by bank to verify the correctness of information furnished by loan seekers Impugned services would be classifiable as Business Support Service and taxable only w.e.f. 1.5.06 Classification under Business auxiliary service is unjustified

Summary

Issues:
1. Appeal against service tax demand for "Business Auxiliary Service"
2. Classification of services provided by the appellant
3. Liability for service tax prior to 1-5-2006

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the service tax demand for providing "Business Auxiliary Service." The appellant was accused of not paying service tax under Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed the demand and imposed penalties for non-registration and interest under relevant sections. The appellant contended that the services provided were not related to promoting the client's business but were for evaluating prospective customers for ICICI, classifying it as "Business Support Service." The appellant argued that since the service was rendered before 1-5-2006, there was no liability for service tax.

During the hearing, the learned Advocate representing the appellant argued that the services provided by the appellant were not aimed at promoting the client's business but were for verifying information provided by loan seekers for ICICI. It was highlighted that the appellant's role was limited to evaluating prospective customers for ICICI, which falls under "Business Support Service." The Tribunal agreed with this submission, noting that the services provided could not be classified as promoting the client's business. It was further emphasized that the classification as "Business Support Service" became taxable only from 1-5-2006. Therefore, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties imposed were deemed unjustified.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief as necessary. The judgment clarified that the services rendered by the appellant were correctly classified as "Business Support Service," not subject to service tax liability before 1-5-2006. The decision was pronounced in open court at the conclusion of the hearing.