Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (1) TMI 1328 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the Resolution Plan under Section 30(6) and Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Exclusion of time periods from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
3. Replacement of the Resolution Professional.
4. Evaluation and approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors.
5. Compliance with mandatory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and CIR Regulations.
6. Applications against the approval of the Resolution Plan.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
The application was filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, along with Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, seeking approval for the Resolution Plan submitted by Sterlite Power Transmission Limited (SPTL). The plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with a 95.15% voting share.

2. Exclusion of Time Periods:
Several applications were filed for the exclusion of days lost in litigation from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period. The NCLT Kolkata Bench initially granted an exclusion of 45 days, which was later extended by the NCLT Cuttack Bench by 30 days and subsequently by 98 days, setting the end date for the CIRP as 14th November 2019.

3. Replacement of the Resolution Professional:
IA No. 18/CTB/2019 was filed for the replacement of the existing Resolution Professional with Mr. Bhuvan Madan. This was approved by the CoC with 100% voting, and the NCLT Cuttack Bench allowed the application.

4. Evaluation and Approval by CoC:
The CoC received seven prospective applications for the Resolution Plan, but only SPTL submitted a plan by the extended deadline. Another applicant, IMR Metallurgical Resources AG, was allowed to submit their plan after the deadline. Both plans were evaluated, with SPTL scoring higher (91.26%) compared to IMR (80.42%). The CoC approved SPTL's plan with a 95.15% voting share.

5. Compliance with Mandatory Requirements:
The Resolution Plan complied with the mandatory requirements under Section 30(2) of the Code and relevant CIR Regulations, including provisions for insolvency resolution process costs, payment to operational creditors, management of the Corporate Debtor’s affairs, implementation and supervision of the plan, and compliance with applicable laws. The plan also addressed the interests of all stakeholders and provided an implementation schedule.

6. Applications Against Approval:
Several applications were filed against the approval of the Resolution Plan:
- CA (IB) No. 160/CTB/2019 by an unsuccessful Resolution Applicant was dismissed.
- IA (IB) No. 175/CTB/2019 by the Promoters/Directors of the Corporate Debtor, challenging the plan and proposing a superior settlement, was dismissed. The objections regarding the inclusion of expertise in power and the undervaluation of assets were overruled.
- CA (IB) No. 162/CTB/2019 and CA (IB) No. 176/CTB/2019 by the Government of India (GST & Central Excise) were dismissed.

Order:
The Resolution Plan submitted by Sterlite Power Transmission Limited was approved by the NCLT Cuttack Bench, making it binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including Central and State Governments, local authorities, guarantors, and other stakeholders. The application CA (IB) No. 157/CTB/2019 was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates