Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (3) TMI 1808 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Disallowance of prior period expenses, Disallowance of depreciation on account of non-ITA deduction of TDS.

Dispute regarding disallowance of prior period expenses:
The appellant, a company engaged in import and trading of chemicals, appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 4,90,314/- towards prior period expenses for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tax Audit Report mentioned this amount as prior period expenditure, leading to its disallowance by the Assessing Officer (AO) as it was not incurred during the previous year. The appellant contended that the expenses were crystallized during the previous year and should be allowed as deduction. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dismissed the claim, stating that the prior period income exceeded expenses, thus justifying the disallowance. On appeal, the Tribunal found that the expenses were more than income, contrary to the CIT(A)'s assumption. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the expenses in the relevant assessment year, dismissing one ground and allowing the other.

Dispute regarding disallowance of depreciation:
The AO disallowed depreciation of Rs. 76,300/- on capital expenditure due to non-ITA deduction of TDS on additions made to assets during the relevant assessment year. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, citing section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the Tribunal observed that the deduction claimed for depreciation did not fall under the categories specified in the provision. Referring to a previous decision, the D.R. argued for the applicability of section 40(a)(ia) to capital expenditure. Nonetheless, the Tribunal found no relevance to that decision in the present case and directed the deletion of the disallowance. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, ruling in favor of the assessee.

Separate Judgment:
No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates