Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2018 (10) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (10) TMI 1905 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
Company petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IB Code 2016) against a corporate debtor.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background Facts:
The petition was filed by a financial creditor against a corporate debtor under Section 7 of the IB Code 2016. The financial creditor had sanctioned a term loan to the corporate debtor, which the debtor failed to repay, leading to a significant outstanding amount.

2. Documents Submitted by Financial Creditor:
The financial creditor submitted various documents to prove the existence of the financial debt and the default by the corporate debtor. These documents included sanction letters, facility agreements, deeds of hypothecation, and other relevant agreements.

3. Contentions of the Financial Creditor:
The financial creditor argued that the corporate debtor failed to repay the loan as per the agreed terms and also did not adhere to the proposed One Time Settlement (OTS) under the Master Restructuring Agreement.

4. Contentions of the Corporate Debtor:
The corporate debtor acknowledged the loan but stated its financial distress, including losses in consecutive financial years, cash crunch, delayed payments to employees, and statutory dues. The debtor also mentioned other loans from a consortium of banks and financial institutions.

5. Decision of the Adjudicating Authority:
After considering submissions from both parties and examining the evidence, the Adjudicating Authority found that the financial creditor had established a clear case of default by the corporate debtor. The authority admitted the petition and ordered the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):
The authority appointed an IRP to manage the affairs of the corporate debtor during the insolvency resolution process. The IRP was directed to initiate the resolution process, make public announcements, and call for submissions of claims.

7. Moratorium and Prohibitions:
A moratorium was declared from the date of the order till the completion of the resolution process, prohibiting various actions against the corporate debtor, including suits, asset transfers, and recovery of property. Essential services to the debtor were to continue during this period.

8. Compliance and Assistance:
The IRP was instructed to comply with specific sections of the IB Code, and the directors and promoters of the corporate debtor were directed to cooperate with the IRP in managing the company's affairs.

9. Order Compliance:
The financial creditor, the registry, and the IRP were directed to comply with the order, with the registry communicating the decision to all relevant parties.

10. Conclusion:
The tribunal's decision to admit the petition and initiate the insolvency resolution process was based on the established default by the corporate debtor and the evidence provided by the financial creditor, leading to the appointment of an IRP and the declaration of a moratorium.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates