9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Validity of detention order challenged
Analysis: The case involves a challenge to the validity of a detention order passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India. The appellants were initially arrested following a raid by officers of the Central Bureau of Narcotics, which led to the seizure of a significant amount of opium. Subsequently, the appellants were detained under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The grounds of detention were communicated to the appellants within the stipulated time, and their detention was later confirmed. The appellants contended that the detention order was illegal, invalid, and punitive in nature. They moved the High Court, which dismissed their petitions, noting that the detaining authority had shown awareness of the appellants' custody and had provided compelling reasons for the detention. During the hearing, the advocate for the appellants highlighted the potential consequences of the detention order, particularly regarding the forfeiture of the detenue's property. The advocate relied on previous court decisions to argue that the detention order should be quashed. The Supreme Court referred to earlier judgments that emphasized the need for the detaining authority to be satisfied about the likelihood of the detenue being released on bail before passing a detention order. The Court found that the reasoning provided by the concerned officer in this case did not meet the required standard. The officer's reference to the likelihood of the detenue moving a bail application was deemed insufficient, as it did not address the crucial aspect of the detenue actually being released on bail. Consequently, the Supreme Court concluded that the detention order lacked sufficient justification and quashed it, disposing of the appeals accordingly.
|
