9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of the Payment of Gratuity Act and Regulations, applicability of income tax on gratuity, and the legality of a demand notice issued to retirees.
Interpretation of Payment of Gratuity Act and Regulations: The petitioners, retired employees of the Punjab School Education Board, were entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act and Regulations. The maximum limit of gratuity was increased from Rs. 3.5 lakhs to Rs. 10 lakhs after the Fifth Pay Commission. The petitioners were paid the remaining amount after deduction of Rs. 3.5 lakhs. The issue was regarding the impugned notice directing the petitioners to pay income tax on the balance amount paid to them. The relevant notification specified Rs. 10 lakhs as the limit for gratuity without addressing the taxable aspect. Applicability of Income Tax on Gratuity: The Court examined Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, which outlines various exemptions from total income. The provision does not categorize the gratuity paid to the petitioners as taxable income. Despite persistent questioning, the respondent failed to justify the demand for income tax on gratuity. Legal advice obtained by the Board also confirmed that gratuity should not be subject to tax within the specified limits. Legality of Demand Notice: The Court found that the respondents unjustifiably issued demand notices to retirees for income tax on gratuity without legal authority. Despite clear legal advice against such action, the respondents persisted with their stance. The Court quashed the impugned notices as lacking legal basis and justification. The respondents were burdened with costs of Rs. 1 lakh for causing inconvenience to the petitioners and wasting the Court's time, to be deposited within two months. Conclusion: The judgment clarified that gratuity paid to the petitioners was not taxable within the specified limits and criticized the respondents for their unwarranted demand for income tax. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions and penalized the respondents for their unjustifiable actions.
|
