9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in a case where lands were sold to the Government by negotiation after executing sale deeds, rather than being compulsorily acquired.
In this case, the writ petitioner, a Society established under the Travancore Cochin Societies Registration Act, 1955, aimed at developing Information Technology Parks. The Government identified suitable lands in Ernakulam District and issued notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Section 6(1) of the Survey and Boundaries Act, 1961. The District Level Purchase Committee was authorized to determine land prices, which would then be approved by the Empowered Committee. Parties had the option to either negotiate a settlement or go through the land acquisition procedure. In this instance, a large extent of lands was sold through negotiation, and the Government withdrew from land acquisition by effacing the Section 4 notification. The appellants demanded tax deduction under Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which applies to compensation on compulsory land acquisition. However, in this case, the lands were sold through negotiation after executing sale deeds, not compulsorily acquired. Section 194LA mandates a 10% tax deduction only in compulsory acquisitions, not in negotiated sales. The court emphasized the strict interpretation of taxing statutes and noted that before the introduction of Section 194LA, the entire compensation was payable to landowners in compulsory acquisitions. The court concluded that Section 194LA does not apply when lands are purchased through sale deeds. The learned Single Judge meticulously considered all contentions raised by the appellants, who did not claim any points were overlooked. The High Court agreed with the Single Judge's views and dismissed the appeal.
|
