Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (1) TMI 1960 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
Adjudication of insolvency application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal; Default in payment by the Corporate Debtor; Claim of outstanding dues by the Financial Creditor; Admission of application and appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP); Declaration of moratorium.

Analysis:

1. The case involves the adjudication of an insolvency application filed by a Financial Creditor against a Corporate Debtor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The prayer seeks the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, declaration of moratorium, and appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).

2. The Corporate Debtor failed to make payments despite outlining a settlement proposal, leading to delays in the proceedings. The Authority noted the lack of constructive proposals from the Corporate Debtor for settlement.

3. A jurisdictional issue was raised by the Counsel for the Corporate Debtor, contending that the matter falls under the NCLT, Cochin Bench. However, since the Cochin Bench was non-functional at the time of filing and all matters were being adjudicated by NCLT, Chennai Bench, the objection was deemed meritless.

4. The Financial Creditor claimed outstanding dues of a significant amount against the Corporate Debtor, supported by documentary evidence and a Statement of Account.

5. The Financial Creditor detailed the facilities availed by the Corporate Debtor from a bank, including cash credit, bill discounting, bank guarantee limits, and term loans for vehicle purchase, along with related agreements and promissory notes.

6. Despite admitting liability in past communications, the Corporate Debtor failed to service the loans, leading to a default in payments. The debt was assigned to the Financial Creditor, who initiated SARFAESI proceedings and filed an Original Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

7. The Corporate Debtor's defense was limited, with an admission of liability in an affidavit. The documentary evidence presented established the default by the Corporate Debtor, fulfilling the legal requirements for admission of the insolvency application.

8. The Tribunal admitted the application, ordered the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional. A moratorium was declared to prohibit actions against the Corporate Debtor's assets during the resolution process.

9. The appointed IRP was directed to take charge of the Corporate Debtor's management, make a public announcement, and call for claim submissions. The Registry was instructed to communicate the order to the parties involved promptly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates