2018 (7) TMI 2262 - HC - Income Tax

Adjournment seeked - HELD THAT - As petitioner submits that the amount due to the respondent was offered to him but he declined to accept the same. At this stage, Mr. Srivastava, respondent No. 1 submits that he will accept the money which has been offered to him by the petitioner under protest as only half of the money is offered to him which is disputed by Mr. Katyal, Advocate. Be as it may be, in case the money is accepted, it would be without prejudice to rights and contentions of both the parties.List on 16th February, 2016.

Summary

The Delhi High Court judgment involved an adjournment request by Respondent No. 1 due to his counsel's unavailability. The petitioner offered money to the respondent, who initially declined but later agreed to accept half of the amount under protest. The court scheduled the next hearing for February 16, 2016.