Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2021 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 1264 - HC - GST


Issues:
Challenge to non-reimbursement of differential tax amount post transition from VAT to GST in works contract.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the action of the Opposite Parties for not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the transition from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) effective from July 1, 2017. The main issue highlighted was the difficulty faced by contractors due to the change in the tax regime under GST concerning works contracts. The grievance was that due to the introduction of GST, the petitioner had to pay taxes that were not anticipated at the time of entering into the agreement.

The Government issued revised guidelines superseding the previous guidelines regarding works contracts under GST. The guidelines clarified that works contracts are treated as a composite supply of service under GST and are taxable at different rates depending on the nature of the contract. The revised guidelines also provided a detailed procedure for determining the amount payable to works contractors in cases where tenders were invited before July 1, 2017, but payments were made post-GST implementation. The guidelines emphasized the need for a supplementary agreement to be signed for the revised GST-inclusive work value, with provisions for reimbursement or reduction in payment based on the revised value.

The court directed the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority within four weeks, following which the authority would consider and dispose of the grievance in line with the revised guidelines issued by the Finance Department. The petitioner was given the option to challenge the authority's decision if aggrieved. Additionally, the court ordered that no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until a specified date. Finally, the writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with instructions for parties to access the order digitally due to COVID-19 restrictions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates