Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2022 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (3) TMI 1489 - AT - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Aluminum Slugs.
2. Adherence to past customs classification practices.
3. Applicability of specific versus residuary tariff headings.
4. Interpretation of relevant tariff headings and notes.
5. Treatment of aluminum slugs in the context of the manufacturing process.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Aluminum Slugs:
The primary issue is the classification of "Aluminum Slugs" imported by the appellant. The appellant claimed classification under Heading 7606 91 10, which pertains to "Aluminium Plates, Sheets and Strip, of a thickness exceeding 0.2 mm," specifically under the sub-heading for "circles." The customs authority, however, classified the goods under Heading 7616 99 90, which covers "Other articles of Aluminium."

2. Adherence to Past Customs Classification Practices:
The appellant argued that the customs had previously classified the same goods under Heading 7606 91 10, and the change in classification for the goods imported in November 2009 was done without any notice or speaking order. The appellant provided copies of past Bills of Entry to support this claim.

3. Applicability of Specific Versus Residuary Tariff Headings:
The tribunal emphasized that classification should be made under specific entries in preference to residuary entries. The appellant contended that the aluminum slugs, being circular pieces obtained by punching from an aluminum strip, should be classified under Heading 7606 as "circles." The tribunal noted that the revenue intended to classify the goods under a residuary heading, which is generally less specific.

4. Interpretation of Relevant Tariff Headings and Notes:
The tribunal examined the competing tariff headings. Heading 7606 covers "Aluminium Plates, Sheets and Strip, of a thickness exceeding 0.2 mm," including "circles." Heading 7616 is a residuary heading for "Other articles of aluminium." The tribunal referred to Note "d" to Chapter 76, which states that plates, sheets, strip, and foil of aluminum, including those of shapes other than rectangular or square, should be classified under Heading 7606 or 7607, provided they do not assume the character of articles or products of other headings.

5. Treatment of Aluminum Slugs in the Context of the Manufacturing Process:
The appellant used the aluminum slugs to manufacture aluminum collapsible tubes through an impact extrusion process. The tribunal noted that the classification proposed by the revenue under Heading 7616 would be contrary to the general structure of the tariff, which classifies raw materials used in manufacturing under headings that occur prior to the heading of the finished goods. The tribunal also referred to the case of Shalimar Textile Mfg., where it was observed that slugs are distinct from circles but are prepared for subsequent fabrication.

Conclusion:
The tribunal concluded that the aluminum slugs imported by the appellant should be classified under Heading 7606 as "circles," based on the specific description provided in the tariff and the general rules of interpretation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

Order:
The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, pronouncing the order in open court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates