Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2010 (5) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (5) TMI 955 - SC - Indian Laws

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the issues of conviction and sentence under Section 498A and Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code based on the death of a woman within 7 years of her marriage, alleged to be due to cruelty and harassment related to dowry demands.

Conviction under Section 498A and Section 304B IPC:
The appeal was against the conviction and sentence under Section 498A and Section 304B IPC by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which was based on the presumption of dowry death under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act. The prosecution had to prove cruelty or harassment for dowry demands soon before the woman's death to establish dowry death. The defense argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove such cruelty or harassment.

Evidence and Legal Analysis:
The defense contended that the evidence relied upon by the trial Court and the High Court, mainly the statements of the deceased's mother and brother, was insufficient to prove the cruelty or harassment leading to suicide. The defense highlighted that the prosecution failed to establish a connection between the alleged cruelty and dowry demands, as required under Section 304B IPC. The defense also pointed out omissions in witness statements, which were considered fatal to the prosecution's case.

Presumption of Dowry Death:
The prosecution argued that the provisions of Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act create a presumption of dowry death if cruelty or harassment for dowry demands is proven. The burden of proof shifts to the accused to prove innocence once such presumption is established. However, the defense emphasized that the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Section 113B and failed to prove dowry death beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment and Conclusion:
After considering the arguments, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, giving the benefit of doubt to the appellants. The Court found the evidence insufficient to establish the guilt under Sections 498A and 304B IPC. The Court emphasized the necessity to prove cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands to establish dowry death under Section 304B IPC. The judgment of the trial Court and the High Court was set aside, and the appellants were acquitted of the charges.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates