Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2017 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (12) TMI 1853 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Interpretation of Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. for exemption from CVD regarding imported goods described as "solar inverter" under the heading "solar power generating system."

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal, where the respondent imported goods described as "solar inverter" and claimed exemption from CVD under Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. The dispute revolved around whether the description "solar generating system" covered the imported goods. The original authority denied the benefit, but the Commissioner (Appeals) granted it, leading to the Revenue's appeal. The main contention was that the imported goods could not be classified under "solar power generating system" due to potential multiple users and the lack of specific mention in the Notification.

The Tribunal noted that the appeal could be disposed of after dismissing the stay application. It was observed that Sl. No. 332 of the Notification provided benefits for non-conventional energy devices or systems specified in the list, including "solar power generating system." Upon reviewing the records, the Tribunal found that the goods described as "solar inverter" performed the function of generating electricity when exposed to sunlight, falling within the description of "solar power generating system." Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and disposing of the stay application.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of the Notification and the functionality of the imported goods. The Tribunal determined that the "solar inverter" qualified as a "solar power generating system," leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and upholding the benefit claimed by the respondent.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates