9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Welfare and well-being of the minor child. 2. Necessity of considering the facts of the case when there is an order passed by a foreign court. 3. Enforceability of the US court judgment in India under Section 13(c) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Summary: Issue A: Welfare and Well-being of the Minor Child The Supreme Court addressed whether the High Court failed to consider the welfare and well-being of the minor child before issuing directions. The wife argued that the High Court did not consider the child's welfare, who had been living happily in India with his mother since July 2008. The Court noted that the child was born in the USA and was a US citizen. Despite the mother's claims of the father's alcohol dependency and employment issues, the Court emphasized that the child's removal from the USA was in defiance of court orders. The Court upheld the High Court's directions, emphasizing the need to respect the jurisdiction of the court where the child was born and had the most intimate contact. Issue B: Necessity of Considering the Facts of the Case The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court erred in holding that it was unnecessary to go into the facts of the case when there was an order by a foreign court. The Court referred to the principle of comity of courts, stating that the jurisdiction of the state with the most intimate contact with the issues should be preferred. The Court held that the High Court correctly exercised its jurisdiction summarily to return the child to the USA, as this was in the best interest of the child and in accordance with the principles of comity. Issue C: Enforceability of the US Court Judgment in India The Supreme Court considered whether the US court judgment was "not conclusive" and hence unenforceable in India under Section 13(c) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court noted that the wife had not pursued any legal proceedings in India for the custody of the child or for declaring the US court orders null and void. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, stating that the US court's orders should be respected and enforced, given the child's citizenship and the circumstances of the case. Additional Observations: The Supreme Court modified the High Court's directions to ensure the welfare of the mother and child upon their return to the USA. The Court directed the husband to make necessary arrangements for their stay and to withdraw the bailable warrants against the wife to enable her to attend custody proceedings in the US courts. The Court dismissed the wife's appeals and upheld the High Court's judgment. Separate Judgement: The Court noted that the husband's criminal appeal challenging the order dated 23rd December 2011 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, related to the criminal complaint filed by the wife, would be listed for arguments separately.
|
