9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70 is a revenue receipt. 2. Whether the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974. 3. Whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the accounting periods relevant to earlier assessment years. 4. Whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Interest Amount as Revenue Receipt: The Tribunal held that the interest amount of Rs. 36,066.70, awarded by the arbitrator for the period from June 1, 1974, to May 29, 1976, on the sum of Rs. 3,00,556 withheld by the public works department, is a revenue receipt. This decision was based on the precedent set in Rockwell Engineering Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 277(Ker), where it was determined that interest awarded due to delayed payment under a contract constitutes a revenue receipt. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Govinda Choudhury and Sons [1993] 203 ITR 881(SC) also supported this view, stating that such interest partakes the same character as the original payment due under the contract. Therefore, the court affirmed that the interest amount is a revenue receipt liable to be taxed for the assessment year 1979-80. 2. Cash System of Accounting: The Tribunal, along with the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, concluded that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the termination of its business in 1974. This finding was based on the records of the case and was accepted by the court in the absence of any contrary evidence. Consequently, the interest amount received during the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1979-80 was assessable in that year. The court answered this question in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. 3. Deduction of Interest Paid to Federal Bank (Previous Years): The assessee claimed deduction of the interest paid to the Federal Bank during previous accounting years from the amounts received under the arbitration award. The Tribunal did not allow this deduction, citing that the assessee was following the cash system of accounting after the business's termination. The court upheld this view, stating that under section 176(3A) of the Income Tax Act, any sum received after the discontinuance of a business is deemed to be the income of the recipient and charged to tax accordingly in the year of receipt. The court emphasized that only that portion of the receipt which would have been included in the total income of the person during the accounting year as computed in the manner laid down in the Act can be charged to tax. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction of the interest paid during previous assessment years. This question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. 4. Deduction of Interest Paid to Federal Bank (Assessment Year 1979-80): The Department contended that no deduction should be allowed for the interest paid to the Federal Bank during the assessment year 1979-80. However, the court held that the interest paid during the accounting year in which the interest on delayed payment was received must be considered as expenditure for deriving the income from the business. Since the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, the interest paid to the bank during the accounting year must be deducted from the amount received. The court answered this question in the affirmative, against the Department and in favor of the assessee. Conclusion: The court upheld the Tribunal's decisions on all four questions, affirming that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee was following the cash system of accounting, deductions for interest paid in previous years are not allowable, and deductions for interest paid during the relevant assessment year are allowable.
|
