2004 (10) TMI 87 - AAR - Income Tax

Applicant formed a consortium which was awarded by Petronet LNG Ltd. a contract of turnkey project for setting up a liquefied natural gas - amounts received/receivable by the applicant from Petronet LNG in respect of offshore supply of equipment and materials is liable to be taxed in India under the provisions of the Act and the India-Japan Treaty - we decline to answer the other part of the question in regard to quantification of the amount taxable in India as the parties produced no evidence

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of amounts received for offshore supply of equipment and materials.
2. Attribution of profits to operations carried out in India.
3. Taxability of amounts received for offshore services.
4. Extent of taxability of amounts received for offshore services.
5. Deduction of expenses incurred in computing income from offshore services.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Amounts Received for Offshore Supply of Equipment and Materials:
The applicant, a non-resident Japanese company, formed a consortium awarded a turnkey project by Petronet LNG Limited. The project involved offshore and onshore supply and services, with payments made in US dollars and Indian rupees. The applicant argued that the sale of equipment and machinery occurred outside India, with property passing to Petronet on high seas, thus not taxable in India. However, the Authority held that the income from offshore supply is deemed to accrue in India due to the composite nature of the contract, which included significant operations within India. The offshore supply was inextricably linked to the Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, making the profits taxable under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act and Article 7 of the India-Japan tax treaty.

2. Attribution of Profits to Operations Carried Out in India:
The Authority noted that only the portion of the income reasonably attributable to operations carried out in India would be taxable. This follows the explanation to Section 9(1)(i) of the Act and Article 7(1) of the Treaty. The Authority declined to quantify the amount due to a lack of evidence and arguments presented by the parties.

3. Taxability of Amounts Received for Offshore Services:
The offshore services, including design and engineering, were deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and Article 12 of the Treaty. The Authority rejected the applicant's argument that these services were part of the composite contract and should be treated as business income. Instead, they were classified as 'fees for technical services' and thus taxable in India.

4. Extent of Taxability of Amounts Received for Offshore Services:
The entire amount received for offshore services is chargeable to tax under the Act and the Treaty. As per Section 115A(1)(b)(B) and Article 12(2) of the Treaty, the tax rate is capped at 20% of the gross amount of fees for technical services.

5. Deduction of Expenses Incurred in Computing Income from Offshore Services:
The Authority held that the applicant could not claim any deductions for expenses incurred in computing the income from offshore services. Section 44D of the Act, which excludes deductions under Sections 28 to 44C for foreign companies, applies. Similarly, the Treaty provisions mandate that the entire fee for technical services is taxable without deductions, with a tax cap of 20%.

Conclusion:
The Authority ruled that amounts received for offshore supply and services are taxable in India, with the offshore supply profits attributable to Indian operations. Offshore services are taxable as technical fees, and no deductions for expenses are allowed. The tax rate for offshore services is capped at 20% of the gross amount under both the Act and the Treaty.

← Previous Next →