Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (3) TMI 1020 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Eligibility for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as an alternative claim.
3. Validity of approval by the Director of Software Technology Parks of India (STPI) under the STP scheme.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Eligibility for Deduction under Section 10B
The primary issue was whether the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for profits derived from its call centre operations registered with STPI as a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU).

- Facts and Arguments: The assessee started call centre operations on 16-02-2006 and claimed exemption under Section 10B. The AO denied the deduction on the grounds that the assessee did not have a certificate of approval from the Board of Approval (BOA) appointed by the Central Government as required by Section 14 of the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951.
- Assessee's Defense: The assessee argued that the power to grant approval had been delegated to the Development Commissioner and that the approval granted by the Development Commissioner should be valid for the purpose of Section 10B. The assessee provided various documents, including a letter of permission, legal agreements, green card, and other certificates to support its claim.
- Tribunal's Findings: The tribunal found that the approval granted under the STP scheme by the designated officer of the Department of Information Technology and the Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee (IMSC) complied with all requirements for Section 10B. The tribunal noted that denying the deduction would defeat the purpose of setting up a unit and registering it with STPI as a 100% EOU.

Issue 2: Eligibility for Deduction under Section 10A as an Alternative Claim
The assessee also claimed that it should be allowed deduction under Section 10A if the deduction under Section 10B was denied.

- Facts and Arguments: The assessee argued that it met all the conditions stipulated under Section 10A and that the approval by the Director of STPI should be considered valid for this purpose.
- Tribunal's Findings: The tribunal referred to CBDT Instruction No. 1/2006, which clarified that approval by the Director of STPI should not be a ground to deny deduction under Section 10A, provided all other conditions were met. The tribunal also cited various judicial precedents, including the ITAT Chandigarh's decision in the case of Bebo Technologies (P) Ltd and the ITAT Mumbai's decision in ITO Vs. Accentia Technologies Limited, which supported the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10A despite quoting the wrong section in the return of income.

Issue 3: Validity of Approval by the Director of STPI
The tribunal examined whether the approval granted by the Director of STPI under the STP scheme was valid for the purpose of claiming deductions under Sections 10A and 10B.

- Facts and Arguments: The assessee provided various documents, including a green card and letters from the STPI, confirming the approval as a 100% EOU under the STP scheme. The CBDT's instruction dated 9th March 2009 also clarified that approvals by the Development Commissioner were valid for Section 10B.
- Tribunal's Findings: The tribunal found that the approval granted by the Director of STPI under the STP scheme complied with all the requirements for Sections 10A and 10B. The tribunal emphasized that the purpose behind granting such approvals was to promote export-oriented units and that denying the deduction would be contrary to this objective.

Conclusion:
The tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to claim deductions under both Sections 10A and 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found no infirmity in the orders of the CIT(A) and dismissed the revenue's appeals while allowing the cross-objections filed by the assessee. The judgment emphasized the importance of interpreting the provisions in a manner that aligns with the legislative intent of promoting export-oriented units. The tribunal's decision was pronounced in open court on 04-03-2016.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates