Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (5) TMI 96 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Stay applications for outstanding demand of penalty under section 271C of the I.T. Act for A.Ys. 2010-2011 to 2014-2015.

Detailed Analysis:
The stay applications were filed by the assessee seeking a stay of the outstanding demand of penalty levied under section 271C of the I.T. Act for multiple assessment years. The total demand of penalty for all relevant assessment years amounted to Rs. 11,95,84,931 after payment of Rs. 2,98,98,234, being 20% of the total demand. The assessee contended that it transfers its 'right to pre-paid services' to distributors on a principal-to-principal basis, and since there is no requirement to withhold any tax under Section 194H of the I.T. Act, the penalty should not be levied. The matter involved a survey under section 133A of the Act and subsequent penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) under section 271C of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty orders, leading the assessee to file appeals before the ITAT. The Tribunal considered the divergent views of various High Courts on the issue and noted that the appeals on merits were pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Given these circumstances, the Tribunal granted a stay of the balance of the demand for 180 days or till the disposal of the appeals, whichever is earlier.

The main issue revolved around whether the assessee was required to make any Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under section 194H of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal observed that this issue was pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, with different High Courts expressing conflicting views. The Tribunal had already granted a stay of the outstanding tax demand under section 201(1) and the interest under section 201(1A) of the I.T. Act, considering the pending appeals on merits and the fact that the assessee had paid 40% of the demand as directed by the jurisdictional High Court. As the assessee had paid 20% of the demand of penalty under section 271C of the I.T. Act, the Tribunal found the balance of convenience in favor of the assessee and decided to stay the remaining demand for a specified period or until the disposal of the appeals. The Tribunal directed the Registry to schedule the appeals for hearing on a specific date without the need for fresh notices, and consequently, allowed the stay petitions of the assessee.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the stay petitions of the assessee concerning the outstanding demand of penalty under section 271C of the I.T. Act, considering the pending appeals on the main issue of TDS under section 194H before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the partial payment made by the assessee towards the demand. The Tribunal granted a stay for a specified period or till the disposal of the appeals, whichever is earlier, and directed the scheduling of the appeals for a hearing on a specific date.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates