9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (6) TMI 1023 - HC - Income TaxDeduction under Section 80 HHC on export profits arrived at on the basis of the export turnover and the total turnover exclusive of Excise duty and Sales-tax - Held that - Issue is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Lakshmi Machine Works reported in 2007 (4) TMI 202 - SUPREME Court Sales-tax incentive - revenue or capital receipt - Held that - he issues involved in these appeals are squarely covered by the decisions of this Court in Commissioner of Incometax v. Birla VXL Ltd. reported in (2013 (7) TMI 655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ) and in Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Munjal Auto Industries Ltd. reported in (2013 (10) TMI 650 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT) wherein held it can thus be straightaway seen that the benefit, though computed in terms of the Sales Tax liability in the hands of the recipient, the same was not mean to give any benefit on day-to-day functioning of the business, or for making the industry more profitable. The principle aim of the scheme was to cover the capital outlay already made by the assessee in undertaking special modernization of its existing industry . Therefore, the questions of law posed for our consideration in these appeals are answered in favour of the assessee
Issues:
1. Challenge to different judgments and orders of the Tribunal for different assessment years. 2. Interpretation of the nature of Sales-tax incentive received by the assessee as a capital receipt. 3. Computation of deduction under Section 80 HHC on export profits. 4. Levying interest under section 234D of the Act. 5. Consideration of Sales-tax exemption benefit as capital receipts. Issue 1: Challenge to Tribunal Judgments The department challenged various judgments and orders of the Tribunal for different assessment years, although the issues were identical. The High Court decided to hear and dispose of these appeals together. Issue 2: Nature of Sales-tax Incentive The main question was whether the Sales-tax incentive received by the assessee should be considered a capital receipt. The department argued that the Tribunal erred in reversing the decision of the CIT (A) and treating the Sales-tax incentive as a capital receipt. They relied on previous court decisions to support their argument. Issue 3: Deduction under Section 80 HHC The issue of computing deduction under Section 80 HHC on export profits was raised. The appellant contended that this issue was settled by a Supreme Court decision in a specific case. Issue 4: Levying Interest under Section 234D One of the questions raised was whether interest under section 234D of the Act was leviable only from a specific assessment year. The Tribunal had deleted the levy of interest under this section, which was challenged in the appeal. Issue 5: Sales-tax Exemption Benefit Another question was whether the Sales-tax exemption benefit should be considered as capital receipts. The respondent argued that the Tribunal correctly analyzed the issue based on earlier decisions and the purpose of the schemes providing the incentives. The appellant cited various court decisions to support their arguments, emphasizing that the Sales-tax incentive should be treated as a capital receipt. However, the respondent contended that the Tribunal's decision was in line with previous court judgments and the objectives of the incentive schemes. The High Court, after considering the arguments and relevant precedents, concluded that the issues raised in the appeals were already settled by previous decisions of the Court. Therefore, the questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee, and all the appeals were dismissed.
|
