Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2016 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (9) TMI 665 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
- Direction to furnish records for purchases and sales
- Permission for cross-examination of third parties
- Conducting a detailed inquiry before Revision Notices
- Pre-decided matter in pre-revision notices
- Authority's reliance on Enforcement Wing report
- Assessing Officer's duty to independently assess
- Dealer's objections and lack of evidence
- Principles of natural justice and complete records
- Lack of material evidence with Assessing Officer
- Directions for submission of representation and document supply

Analysis:

The petitioner, a registered dealer under TNVAT Act and Central Sales Tax Act, sought directions to furnish records for purchases and sales and permission for cross-examination of third parties. The Court noted pre-revision notices pre-decided the matter, directing the Assessing Officer to be present. The notices stemmed from surprise inspections in 2014, with the Assessing Officer relying on the Enforcement Wing report, verbatim repeating its observations.

The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer's duty to independently assess, not solely relying on the Enforcement Wing report. The dealer denied transactions, questioning lack of evidence from the Enforcement Wing. The Assessing Officer extracted dealer statements and Enforcement Wing observations, highlighting the need for complete records and principles of natural justice.

Clarifying the lack of material evidence, the Assessing Officer was unable to provide requested documents. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation for required documents, to be obtained from the Enforcement Wing. Once received, the petitioner could submit objections, have a personal hearing, and request cross-examination. The assessment should be completed independently within eight weeks, emphasizing the need for a fair process and adherence to legal principles.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates