9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (12) TMI 215 - HC - Central ExciseInterest on irregular cenvat credit Held that - On a plain reading of the above rule it is clear that since the respondent assessee used the Cenvat credit wrongly he became liable to pay duty along with interest as provided under the said rules. The provisions of Sections 11A, 11AA and 11AB provided for procedure for recovery of the said duty along with interest in case the assessee fails to pay the same. - the Tribunal was not justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority in levying interest on the amount of credit which was availed by the respondent-assessee wrongly though the same was paid by the assessee prior to issuance of show cause notice. With the result the substantial question of law formulated in this appeal is answered in favour of the appellant Revenue.
Issues:
1. Challenge to the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding payment of interest on Modvat credit. 2. Interpretation of Rule 57AH of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in relation to recovery of wrongly availed credits. 3. Application of principles from previous judgments in determining liability for interest payment. Issue 1: The central issue in this case revolves around the challenge to the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the payment of interest on Modvat credit. The respondent-assessee had availed Modvat credit on certain items that did not fall within the definition of capital goods under the Excise Rules. Upon audit observations, the assessee agreed to reverse the credit and made the payment before the issuance of a show cause notice. The dispute arose regarding the liability to pay interest on the wrongly availed credit, with the Tribunal setting aside the interest payment based on the timing of the payment in relation to the issuance of the notice. Issue 2: The interpretation of Rule 57AH of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 plays a crucial role in determining the liability for the recovery of wrongly availed credits. Rule 57AH stipulates the recovery of credits wrongly utilized along with interest from the manufacturer. It also outlines the provisions for penalties in cases of fraud or willful misstatement. The rule mandates the application of Sections 11A, 11AA, and 11AB of the Act for effecting such recoveries, emphasizing the consequences of wrongly availing credits and the subsequent obligations of the manufacturer. Issue 3: The application of principles from previous judgments, such as the case of Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. CCE, Visakhapatnam, and CCE, Mangalore v. Shree Krishna Pipe Industries, was a point of contention in this case. The appellant Revenue argued that the Tribunal erred in not considering the established principles regarding the liability to pay interest even if the duty is paid before the issuance of a show cause notice. The High Court concurred with the appellant's position, emphasizing that the payment of duty before the notice does not exempt the assessee from the obligation to pay interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act. In conclusion, the High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order and reinstating the orders of the Assessing Authority and the First Appellate Authority. The judgment reaffirmed the liability of the respondent-assessee to pay interest on the wrongly availed credit, as per the provisions of Rule 57AH and Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, despite the timing of the payment in relation to the issuance of the show cause notice.
|
