Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2009 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (10) TMI 3 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Whether the service tax paid by the respondent is refundable.
2. Whether the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B is applicable to the refund claim.
3. Whether the respondent's activity is taxable under the service tax laws.

Analysis:

1. The respondent obtained service tax registration and paid service tax on the construction of a residential complex. However, they later claimed a refund based on a circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, stating that they were only builders and not engaged in providing the service of constructing residential complexes. The Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund claim, but the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed it, citing a judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. The Revenue appealed against this decision.

2. The Departmental Representative argued that the refund claim was time-barred as it was filed after the expiry of one year from the relevant date of payment. He contended that even if the respondent's activity was considered non-taxable as per the circular, the limitation period under Section 11B should apply. He referenced a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court to support his argument.

3. The Counsel for the respondent argued that the tax collected without the authority of law should not be subject to the limitation period under Section 11B. He relied on a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and Tribunal decisions to support this position. The Counsel also disputed the Department's claim that the respondent was aware of their non-taxable status before the circular was issued.

4. The Member (Technical) considered both arguments and reviewed the facts of the case. It was noted that the respondent paid the service tax without protest and only filed for a refund after the circular clarified their non-taxable status. Referring to relevant legal precedents, including judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it was held that the limitation period under Section 11B applies to refund claims, even if the tax was collected erroneously. As the refund claim was filed after the limitation period, it was deemed time-barred. Consequently, the impugned order allowing the refund was set aside, and the Revenue's appeal was allowed.

5. The judgment was pronounced on 07/10/2009 by Shri Rakesh Kumar, Member (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi.

This detailed analysis covers the issues of the refund claim, the applicability of the limitation period, and the taxable status of the respondent's activity as discussed in the legal judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates