Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2017 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (12) TMI 458 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Classification of micronutrients under CETH 38.08 as Plant Growth Regulator or under CETH 31.05 as other fertilizers.

Analysis:
The issue in this appeal revolves around the classification of micronutrients manufactured by the respondent. The Department contends that the goods should be classified under CETH 38.08 as Plant Growth Regulator, while the respondents argue for classification under CETH 31.05 as other fertilizers. Both lower authorities have determined that the items fall under CTH 31.05. The Department, aggrieved by this decision, has approached the forum for resolution.

The Tribunal refers to a previous decision in the case of CCE & ST, Hyderabad-IV Vs. Aries Agrovet Industries Ltd., where it was held that micronutrients should be classified as other fertilizers in CETH 3105. The Tribunal cites circulars issued by the CBEC, indicating changes in the classification of micronutrients over the years. The CBEC clarified that micronutrients listed under specific categories are classifiable under Heading No.31.05 as Other Fertilizers. The presence of nitrogen and the nature of the goods as mixtures further support their classification as micronutrient fertilizers under CETH 31.05.

The Tribunal delves into the definitions and characteristics of Plant Growth Regulators and micronutrients to differentiate between the two categories. Plant Growth Regulators are identified as organic compounds that affect physiological processes in plants, while micronutrients are essential nutrients required in small quantities for normal plant growth. The CBEC circular dated 06.04.2016 provides clear distinctions between plant growth regulators and micronutrients, emphasizing the role of each in plant development.

Based on the findings and analysis, the Tribunal upholds the decision that micronutrients should be classified under CETH 31.05 as "other fertilizers." The presence of essential nutrients, including nitrogen, and the nature of the goods as mixtures support this classification. Therefore, the appeal is rejected, maintaining the classification of micronutrients as other fertilizers under CETH 31.05.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's detailed analysis and reference to relevant circulars and legal principles establish the proper classification of micronutrients as other fertilizers under CETH 31.05, resolving the classification dispute in this appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates