9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 1187 - AT - Central ExciseCENVAT credit - a part of the amount showing in the invoice has been retained by the appellant in terms of contract towards performance guarantee - Rule 4 (7) of CCR 2004 - Held that - no reversal of credit under Rule 14 can be ordered in such situation - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
Issues: Disallowance of Service Tax credit due to non-payment of full consideration for input services.
In the present case, the appellants, engaged in the manufacture of Zinc & lead concentrate, availed credit on input services but did not pay the full consideration as per the invoice, retaining a part towards performance guarantee. The Revenue initiated proceedings under Rule 4(7) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, to disallow the Service Tax credit attributable to the unpaid consideration. The original authority upheld the disallowance and imposed a penalty. The Tribunal referred to a previous case involving similar facts and held that no reversal of credit can be ordered in such situations, citing various decisions. Relying on the settled cases, the Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable and allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of credit and the penalty. The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the applicability of the Board's circular regarding the retention of a portion of consideration towards performance guarantee. The Tribunal noted that the facts of the present case were similar to those in previous cases where it was held that no reversal of credit could be ordered in such circumstances. By following the precedent set in those cases, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order disallowing the Service Tax credit was not sustainable and, therefore, allowed the appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the order disallowing the Service Tax credit and imposing a penalty on the appellants for not paying the full consideration for the input services. The decision was based on the Tribunal's interpretation of the relevant rules and its application of precedent from previous cases with similar facts. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants, providing relief from the disallowance of credit and the penalty imposed by the Revenue.
|
