9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of section 80J of the Income-tax Act for subsequent assessment years.
Summary: The High Court of Madhya Pradesh addressed a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the eligibility of an assessee for relief under section 80J for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) had initially granted relief under section 80J for the assessment year 1973-74 based on the assessee's substantial expansion activities. However, for the subsequent years, the ITO declined to grant the relief, arguing that the expansion did not qualify as a new undertaking. The Appellate Authority and the Tribunal disagreed with the ITO's view, emphasizing the importance of consistency in assessment proceedings. The court considered the principle of res judicata in income tax proceedings, noting that findings from earlier years should not be reopened in subsequent years unless arbitrary or perverse, and no fresh facts are presented. In this case, the ITO's decision for the assessment year 1973-74 was based on valid grounds, supported by relevant legal precedents. The court highlighted that the ITO's interpretation of section 80J was in line with judicial decisions, and no new information was introduced to challenge the initial finding. Consequently, the court held that the ITO was not competent to disallow the relief under section 80J for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76 based on the facts and circumstances of the case. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency and finality in tax litigations to ensure fairness and certainty. No costs were awarded in this matter.
|
