9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
Late filing of wealth-tax returns for assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72, imposition of penalties u/s 18(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act, rejection of extension applications, validity of advice from chartered accountant, Commissioner's orders challenged. For the assessment year 1970-71: The petitioner filed for extension of time to file wealth-tax return, but no reply was received from the department. The return was filed on 31st May, 1971, with self-assessed wealth tax paid. The department issued a penalty notice for late filing, which was challenged by the petitioner. The Commissioner rejected the petitioner's application based on the chartered accountant's affidavit, questioning the filing date. The High Court found the Commissioner's approach erroneous and ordered a reduced penalty period from 1st January, 1971, to 30th April, 1971, to be calculated under s. 18(1)(a) of the Act. For the assessment year 1971-72: The petitioner was advised by the chartered accountant that filing the wealth-tax return was unnecessary due to low net wealth. After receiving a notice from the department, the return was filed on 26th March, 1973. The department imposed a penalty for late filing, which was contested. The Commissioner's order did not consider the advice given by the chartered accountant. The High Court held that following professional advice constituted a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return, contrary to the Commissioner's decision. The petition was allowed, and the department was directed to refund the penalties imposed for both assessment years. Separate Judgement by B. LENTIN: The High Court Judge, B. Lentin, found the Commissioner's rejection of the chartered accountant's affidavit and failure to consider the professional advice given to the petitioner as erroneous. The Judge ordered a reduced penalty period for the late filing of wealth-tax returns and directed the department to refund the excess penalties imposed.
|
