9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of penalty u/s 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Justification of delay in obtaining the audit report. 3. Validity of penalty proceedings initiated after the assessment order. Summary: Issue 1: Deletion of Penalty u/s 271B The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 271B for failure to get accounts audited by the specified date. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's plea that the delay was due to reconciliation issues in the trial balance and presumed extension of time for filing the return. Issue 2: Justification of Delay in Obtaining Audit Report The AO issued a show cause notice to the assessee to explain the delay in obtaining the audit report. The assessee claimed the delay was due to reconciliation issues and presumed extension of time for filing the return. The AO found the explanation unsatisfactory, noting that the audit started on 25-7-1986 and was completed on 26-8-1986, indicating that the books were given to the auditor only on 25-7-1986, which was too late to meet the 31-7-1986 deadline. Issue 3: Validity of Penalty Proceedings Initiated After the Assessment Order The assessee argued that penalty proceedings u/s 271B should have been initiated during the assessment proceedings, citing various case laws. However, the Tribunal held that penalty proceedings u/s 271B are independent of assessment proceedings and can be initiated at any stage after the default is committed. The Tribunal noted that the AO issued the show cause notice on 15-3-1990 and passed the penalty order on 8-8-1990, which was within the time limit prescribed u/s 275. Conclusion: The Tribunal found no reasonable cause for the delay in obtaining the audit report and held that the penalty proceedings were validly initiated and completed within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty was reversed, and the appeal of the Revenue was allowed.
|
