9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Whether project expenses incurred by the assessee were incidental to the carrying on of the assessee's business of managing agency and were not capital expenditure.
Summary: The High Court of Madras considered the issue of whether project expenses incurred by the assessee were revenue or capital expenditure. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in managing agency business, claimed project expenses for a newsprint paper mill. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the claim as capital expenditure, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) allowed it as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, stating that the expenses were incidental to the business. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal, emphasizing that the purpose of the expenditure was to increase earnings and augment income, making it allowable as revenue expenditure. The Court cited a similar case to support its decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs to the assessee. The Court examined the objects of the company as stated in its memorandum, which included promoting new ventures and acquiring property or liabilities of other companies. The assessee had promoted various companies and investigated multiple projects, with expenses being written off if projects were unsuccessful. The Tribunal found that the project expenditure was incidental to the business of promoting new ventures and managing agents, leading to the conclusion that it was allowable as revenue expenditure. The Court agreed with this view, emphasizing that the expenditure aimed at increasing income and was thus part of the business activities. The Court referenced a previous case to support its decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs to the assessee.
|
