9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of section 40A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the disallowance of discount allowed by the assessee to another firm.
Summary: In the case, the assessee, a registered firm engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling silk cloth, provided a discount of 6% to another firm, M/s. Somasundaram and Brothers, on the sale of silk sarees. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed this discount amount of Rs. 34,546 under section 40A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the close connection between the partners of both firms. The assessee claimed that the discount led to savings in various expenses, but the ITO disagreed. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) allowed the claim, stating that the discount was not unreasonable considering the off-take by the purchasing firm. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, ruling that the discount was part of the net price and not an additional expenditure subject to disallowance under section 40A(2)(a). The Tribunal emphasized that the transaction was genuine, and no excess payment was made by the assessee. Therefore, the court answered the question in the negative, in favor of the assessee, and awarded costs. The provision of section 40A(2)(a) was invoked to determine whether the discount provided by the assessee to another firm could be disallowed as excessive or unreasonable. The Tribunal found that the assessee sold goods to the purchasing firm at a discounted rate, which did not involve any additional payment beyond the net price. Referring to a previous court decision, the Tribunal emphasized that unless there was evidence of sham transactions or underpayment, the tax department could not assess the difference between market price and the actual price as profit. As the Tribunal concluded that the discount was part of the net price and there was no additional expenditure, the disallowance under section 40A(2)(a) was deemed unnecessary. The court upheld the Tribunal's findings, ruling in favor of the assessee and rejecting the revenue's claim for disallowance.
|
